Establishment of an Academic Advising Improvement Team
Background:
The
Campus Academic Plan, 1996-2001, makes a significant commitment to the
improvement of advising at UNC Charlotte.
The commitment embodied by the Plan recognizes that timely and effective
academic advice is an essential element of an overall strategy to enhance
student retention and success.
The
specific initiatives contained in the Academic Plan include:
1.
Development of systematic, clear, and carefully-constructed systems of
advising through college and departmental advising plans that specify the
designated roles and responsibilities of faculty, staff, and peer advising.
2.
Renewed attention through enhanced training and support to improve the
quality of advising delivered by faculty members who have been assigned
advising responsibilities.
3.
As a supplement to college-based efforts, development of regular advisor
training concerning University-wide requirements and academic policies and
procedures, including but not limited to general education, progression, and
academic integrity.
4.
Development of statements for use by faculty and staff advisers, parents,
and students concerning students’ responsibility for their own educational
success, with particular attention to the limitations that students should
observe when undertaking full-or-part-time employment while pursuing a
University degree.
With the Plan now
approved, it is appropriate to set in place the administrative structure we
need for dealing with these issues on an ongoing basis. The centerpiece of that structure must
continue to be the Administrative Council on Undergraduate Affairs which
includes among its membership the associate and assistant deans with formal
responsibilities that include the oversight of advising. But we also need a group of individuals who
have daily operational understanding of advising issues to assess continually
the effectiveness of our advising processes and to make recommendations with
respect to kinds of programs, activities, policy changes, and resources we need
to address the priorities articulated in the Campus Academic Plan.
Academic Advising
Improvement Team:
Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish the Academic
Advising Improvement Team. The Team
will report through and make recommendations to the Administrative Council on
Undergraduate Affairs which is chaired by the Associate Vice Chancellor for
Undergraduate Programs.
As appropriate, recommendations from the Academic
Advising Improvement Team may be implemented directly or referred through the
Provost to the Council of Deans and the faculty governance system for further
consideration.
Membership (17 members)
3 faculty advisors (selected by Provost from
dean’s nominations)
1 team member from each of the College-based
advising centers (6 total)
1 team member from Athletic Advising
1 team member from the Office of Adult
Students and Evening Services
1 team member from the Office of the Vice
Chancellor for Student Affairs
1 team member from the Office of Minority
Academic Services
1 team member from the Office of the
Registrar
1 student team member to be named by the
President of the Student Body
1 student team member to be named by the Dean
of Students
1 staff team member from an academic
department office
Charge:
The overall mission of the Academic Advising Improvement Team is to
assess and improve academic advising across the campus on a continuous basis
by:
*Identifying the primary stakeholders and customers of
the advising activities on campus and their suggested measures of effectiveness
of the results;
*Continuously monitoring campus-wide performance in
meeting the expectations of these stakeholders using the most appropriate of
the measures identified;
*Identifying the processes involved in advising on campus
and opportunities for improvement or redesign of them to better serve the
stakeholders and customers across the campus;
*Assigning specific smaller teams composed of individuals
from this group or others on campus to address particular advising processes
with clear potential for improvement;
*Receiving the reports of these teams and assisting them
in implementing their recommendations for improvement; and
*Serving as a coordinating body and clearinghouse for
effective advising practices across campus, and serving as the body responsible
for maintaining awareness and communication of the most effective advising
practices in other institutions across the country.
Team Resources:
It is envisioned that the Academic Advising Improvement Team will serve
as the campus’ primary mechanism for the continuous assessment and improvement of
advising. Accordingly, the Team will be
provided with opportunities to learn the procedures of continuous quality improvement
(CQI) with the support of facilitators trained under the auspices of the
University Quality Improvement Steering Committee (QISC).
In addition to the resources of key administrative
offices represented through membership on the Team, the Team may call upon
other units or individual members of the campus community for assistance as
needed.
Team Constraints:
Although it is recognized that facility interest and involvement is an
important factor affecting the quality of academic advising, the Team should
confine its assessment of opportunities for improving advising to those that do
not involve fundamental changes in the faculty reward system, including either
the formal or informal criteria that govern the processes of faculty
reappointment, promotion, tenure, and salary administration. These matters are being addressed elsewhere.
Reporting:
It is expected that the Team will report as required to the
Administrative Council and/or the Provost, and will prepare an Annual Report to
the Provost which details the accomplishments for the year and a program of
initiatives for the upcoming year.